OSP vs OPM — Which HCAI Program Do You Need?

Both programs live under HCAI (formerly OSHPD) and both end in a public listing. But they certify different things, take different paths, and cost different amounts. Here's the plain-English comparison.

OSP vs OPM at a glance

FeatureOSP (Special Seismic Pre-approval)OPM (Office of Project Management)
Purpose
Certify equipment family for seismic survival
Pre-approved anchorage details database
Scope
Equipment + mounting + interior components
Anchorage to structure (per family of details)
Code basis
ASCE 7-22 Ch.13, ICC-ES AC156
ASCE 7-22 Ch.13, ACI 318-19 Ch.17
Shake table testing
Required for active Ip=1.5 equipment
Not required
Typical cost
$10K – $45K+
$6K – $12K per family
Typical timeline
6 – 20 weeks
4 – 8 weeks
Best for
OEMs selling into many CA hospitals
Manufacturers with reusable anchorage kits
Listed publicly by HCAI
Yes (OSP number)
Yes (OPM number)

When to pick OSP

  • Active equipment (rotating, energized, pressurized)
  • Ip = 1.5, post-earthquake function required
  • Sold into many California hospital projects
  • Need shake-table proof of operability

When to pick OPM

  • Standard anchorage details reused across projects
  • Passive equipment families (tanks, racks, panels)
  • Wall- or floor-mount kits with consistent geometry
  • Manufacturer wants a public HCAI listing without lab testing

Still unsure? Use this 30-second decision rule

If the equipment must keep running after the design earthquake → OSP, almost always with AC156 shake table testing.

If the equipment is passive and the value is in standardized anchorage → OPM is faster and cheaper.

If you ship multiple product lines into California hospitals → most OEMs end up with both: OSP for active gear, OPM for the shared anchorage kits.

Related guides

Not sure which path fits your equipment?

Send a cut-sheet. We'll tell you within 24 hours whether OSP, OPM, or a project anchorage letter is the right move — and what it will cost.